Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jamie Loeb vs Carolina Meligeni Alves Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Loeb vs Alves analysis and find out who is favored!
Jamie Loeb vs Carolina Meligeni Alves Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Loeb 1 - 0 Alves
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Loeb has won 47.84% of points on their second serve, while Alves has won 46.75%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Loeb, in recent form, has won 53.9% of their opponent's second serve points, while Alves has won 59.41%. The same stats for first serve returns are 39.2% and 42.49% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Loeb has saved 55.29% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Alves has saved 54.68% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Loeb has won 47.37% of matches played (W/L 27/ 30), with Alves winning 55.36% (W/L 31/ 25) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Loeb has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 33/ 22), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 8/ 16). Alves has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 336/ 225), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Loeb has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 48.15% of matches (W/L 26/ 28), where as Alves has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 51.11% of matches (W/L 23/ 22). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Loeb winning 1 times and Alves being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Loeb winning 2 and Alves winning 1. The last match between Loeb and Alves was at the W50 Mexico City, 21-02-2024, Second, Hard with Jamie Loeb getting the victory 6-4 3-6 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:3:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Loeb and Alves have played a deciding set 1 times, with Loeb winning 1 times and Alves 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Loeb winning 0, and Alves 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Loeb has played against opponents with an average rank of 303.6 while Alves has played against players with an average rank of 247.23.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Loeb has won 47% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Alves has won 30% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Loeb has converted 46.03% of breakpoint opportunities, and Alves has converted 49.1% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
304
Rank
132
High
29
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
372
Rank
165
High
28
Age
R
Plays
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
Form
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
55% (295-246)
Career Total W/L
58% (379-279)
54% (15-13)
YTD W/L
66% (27-14)
$219,866
Career Prize Money
$125,563
1
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Jamie Loeb | Carolina Meligeni Alves |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 15 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 8 | 9 |
| DFs (Total) | 6 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:3:0 | 2:3:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 51% (46/90) | 67% (60/90) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 78% (36/46) | 65% (39/60) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 45% (20/44) | 47% (14/30) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 40% (4/10) | 22% (2/9) |
| Return Points W% | 41% (37/90) | 38% (34/90) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 3-6 6-2 |
Stats 
Jamie Loeb
Player
Carolina Meligeni Alves
51%
(
46 of
90)
1st Serve %
67%
(
60 of
90)
8
Aces
9
6
Double Faults
3
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
39 of
60)
45%
(
20 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
38%
(
34 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
37 of
90)
93
Total Points Won
87
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jamie Loeb | Carolina Meligeni Alves |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 54% (15/13) | 66% (27/14) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 55% (37/30) | 66% (60/31) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (323/288) | 57% (472/351) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 73% (8/3) | 50% (4/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (6/6) | 70% (23/10) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 20% (1/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.28 | 0.14 |
| Aces Total | 82 | 55 |
| DFs per game | 0.35 | 0.28 |
| DFs Total | 105 | 112 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:45:53 | 1:46:52 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 301.46 | 231.68 |
| 1st Serve % | 55% (1054/1917) | 65% (1769/2728) |
| 1st Serve W% | 66% (700/1054) | 62% (1096/1769) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (416/862) | 47% (450/959) |
| BPs Won% Total | 45% (111/245) | 49% (188/383) |
| Return Pts W% | 45% (902/2009) | 49% (1306/2666) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 54% (15/13) | 61% (19/12) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 89% (8/1) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 56% (15/27) | 66% (27/41) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 43% (3/7) | 33% (2/6) |
| Deciding Set W% | 40% (4/10) | 33% (3/9) |
| 1st set W, W | 81% (16/13) | 100% (25/25) |
| 1st set W, L | 19% (16/3) | 0% (25/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 17% (12/2) | 13% (16/2) |
Jamie Loeb Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Anastasia Kulikova
Player
Jamie Loeb
59%
(
57 of
96)
1st Serve %
58%
(
44 of
76)
8
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
9
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
33 of
44)
46%
(
18 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
10 of
32)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
37 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
76)
92
Total Points Won
80
|
6-1 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ashton Bowers
Player
Jamie Loeb
53%
(
57 of
108)
1st Serve %
59%
(
55 of
94)
3
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
7
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
41%
(
21 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
44%
(
48 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
45 of
94)
105
Total Points Won
97
|
4-6 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Iva Jovic
Player
Jamie Loeb
56%
(
54 of
97)
1st Serve %
50%
(
50 of
100)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
9
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
51%
(
22 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
43%
(
42 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
47 of
100)
102
Total Points Won
95
|
3-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Iva Jovic
Player
Jamie Loeb
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve %
53%
(
27 of
51)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
62%
(
16 of
26)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
75%
(
15 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jamie Loeb
Player
Ana Sofia Sanchez
46%
(
23 of
50)
1st Serve %
60%
(
41 of
68)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
1
70%
(
16 of
23)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
46%
(
23 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
68)
62
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ashton Bowers
Player
Jamie Loeb
61%
(
43 of
71)
1st Serve %
50%
(
45 of
90)
1
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
3
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
49%
(
35 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
43 of
90)
79
Total Points Won
82
|
2-6 6-3 4-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jamie Loeb
Player
Sophie Chang
51%
(
40 of
79)
1st Serve %
56%
(
41 of
73)
1
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
7
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
72%
(
28 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
25 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
73)
84
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Katrina Scott
Player
Jamie Loeb
57%
(
56 of
98)
1st Serve %
62%
(
69 of
112)
7
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
43 of
69)
50%
(
21 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
39 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
47 of
112)
106
Total Points Won
104
|
7-6(9) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jamie Loeb
Player
Akasha Urhobo
64%
(
55 of
86)
1st Serve %
68%
(
56 of
82)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
32%
(
10 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
42%
(
36 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
82)
84
Total Points Won
84
|
2-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jamie Loeb
Player
Adriana Reami
54%
(
27 of
50)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Carolina Meligeni Alves Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Maja Chwalinska
Player
Carolina Meligeni Alves
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve %
65%
(
30 of
46)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
53%
(
20 of
38)
1st Serve Won
27%
(
8 of
30)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
43%
(
21 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carolina Meligeni Alves
Player
Melisa Ercan
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve %
57%
(
30 of
53)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
31%
(
4 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
17 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
39
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Vivian Wolff
Player
Carolina Meligeni Alves
79%
(
52 of
66)
1st Serve %
63%
(
46 of
73)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
2
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
29%
(
4 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
42%
(
28 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
39 of
73)
77
Total Points Won
62
|
6-1 7-6(9) | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Daria Lodikova
Player
Carolina Meligeni Alves
67%
(
59 of
88)
1st Serve %
67%
(
71 of
106)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
56%
(
33 of
59)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
40 of
71)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
45%
(
40 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
52 of
106)
100
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Carolina Meligeni Alves
Player
Miriana Tona
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve %
74%
(
60 of
81)
9
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
14%
(
3 of
21)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
33%
(
21 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
38 of
81)
80
Total Points Won
64
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Carolina Meligeni Alves
Player
Yuliana Monroy
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve %
76%
(
32 of
42)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
10 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
52
Total Points Won
25
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Carolina Meligeni Alves
Player
Fernanda Labrana
55%
(
23 of
42)
1st Serve %
70%
(
44 of
63)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carolina Meligeni Alves
Player
Maria Jose Sanchez Uribe
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve %
76%
(
44 of
58)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
2
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
42%
(
24 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jazmin Ortenzi
Player
Carolina Meligeni Alves
80%
(
63 of
79)
1st Serve %
75%
(
61 of
81)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
37 of
61)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
42%
(
33 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
81)
83
Total Points Won
77
|
6-2 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Carolina Meligeni Alves
Player
Ana Paula Neffa De Los Rios
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve %
72%
(
26 of
36)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
74%
(
17 of
23)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
36%
(
13 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
39
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Loeb Vs Alves Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
